Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James Emanuel's avatar

Interesting write up, and I tend to agree with the sentiment. In fact, I wrote about a different way to play the Uranium market a few weeks ago: https://rockandturner.substack.com/p/good-time-for-a-slice-of-yellow-cake

However, that Oliver Stone interview was awful. He rambles on, sometimes incoherently, often with erroneous facts. For example, the Fukushima disaster was primarily caused by a hydrogen issue, but it stemmed from a nuclear reactor problem. More particularly, the hydrogen explosions at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant did expose the environment to radiation and people did die from radiation exposure.

He speaks about putting nuclear waste in the ocean because, in his words, water demagnetizes it. What is he talking about?!?! This is about nuclear half-lives, not magnetic fields.

He also says that Marie Curie is the champion of nuclear power, which is arguably correct, but he neglects to say that she died early of radiation exposure.

The big issue in the US is that the oil and gas sector is powerful. It funds, and largely owns, the Republican party. It is not going to sit back and allow nuclear power to displace oil and gas. That's the elephant in the room.

However, nuclear will increase because it is the only viable solution to the climate change issue. And micro nuclear reactors are now available on site in industry which is a game changer. So Uranium demand will increase. But whether a US company is best placed to exploit that trend is questionable - especially with Trump coming to power for the next 5 years.

Yellow Cake may be a better option (link at the top of this comment).

Expand full comment
npf1's avatar

Have a listen to the Palisades Gold Radio Podcast interview with Christopher Grove from last week, talking about REEs (UUUU discussed).

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts