Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pierotlunaire's avatar

No, the analysis isn’t strictly correct, it’s a Rule 9 offer under the Code, not a Guernsey Scheme. The acceptance condition cannot be higher than 50.1% in a Rule 9 offer. So it’s almost certain to go unconditional, and once declared so, there’s 14 days for non-acceptors to accept. Once past 50%, the concert party can buy in the market without restriction. Usefully, they say that they do not intend to seek to delist if they get to 75%. But who wants to hold a stake in a controlled, illiquid, unbiddable Egyptian family company, were Hend can do what she likes?

So the odd appearance of a $60bn activist fund in a complicated SPV structure in an emerging market was a stitch up. Elliott take a nice turn and exit stage left. Not sure why they were there at all, but perhaps Actis refused to sell to Dr Hend at a knock down price.

Paul Welsh's avatar

Fortunately I sold out of these as part of a portfolio rationalisation exercise 6 months or so ago. That turned out, purely by chance, to be near the high. I was actually reluctant to sell because they looked like they had potential but I had to take some difficult decisions in order to reduce the number of my holdings very substantially.

18 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?