Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ian Mears's avatar

I would guess the market values these private companies so low is because, generally, they are high risk and despite maybe having ground breaking technology they often fail. Commercial fusion is still way off in the distance (I’d say even 20 years is optimistic). Out of all of them Hinge looks like a decent prospect, especially as they are in the US health market which is huge and awash with money!

Expand full comment
Damien's avatar

Hi OB, hope you are well. Thanks for your details on IPO; I have been a long term fan of their thesis, to commercialise scientific research, and truly believe they are an astute bunch; but I've turned cold on them, not because of an ignorance that what they do requires patience for fruition, inherent concern of their investments, because I fundamentally disagree on one of the strands you purport to illustrate focus - buybacks. IPO answers to questions in their presentation, showed an aloofness and disconnect. In explaining their decision of buybacks over dividends, they highlighted this reflected investor feedback, name checking RPS (their major shareholder) and PHNX (a major cash I hector investor). Despite, have a various and respected shareholder register, this spoke to me of a complacency. Yes, to other (small) investors, but that because their major shareholder, and their current major financial inputter where happy, they didn't need to focus with ANY urgency on fiscal return of their commercialisation. Whilst at such a NAV discount, buybacks are obviously accretive, frankly when you are at an 80% discount gaining 5 base points on that, pushed forever down the line to realisation, deflated investors like me, that are happy to be patient, happy to ignore short / medium SP drops, but want some crumbs to feed our patience/believe, that IPO's purpose is to make money whilst making life enhancing investments. Without those crumbs, the tunnel vision of only considering your major shareholder/funders, at this point in time, shows a disregard to those who have been, invested, believed, for a long time. It says to me that this is a mgmt that's pandering to such, not for profit of all the shareholders but to propagate the pet projects, careers, of scientists. And I haven't checked the renumeration of mgmt, but doubtlessly that to.

At a very base level, the dividend (,at the previous level), instilled a focus to commercialise and profitise, the buybacks don't because it has a maximum but no minimum, hence discretionary.

Couple of positives - net cash increased. And I think not only will Hinge return profits imminently, but handsomely, and growingly into the future.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts